 |
by Warren Swil
|
Glendale News-Press
May 4, 1996
|
In the high-tech world of digital communications, change takes place
at warp speed. The six months since we last wrote about the city's LNX
computer network/bulletin board system is about the full shelf-life of
many state-of-the-art electronics products. Advances are made so quickly
“obsolete” has taken on a whole new meaning.
However, city budget cycles come and go on a fairly regular, predictable
schedule; once again the rites of spring (budget study sessions) are upon
us. We have already learned the city is facing a potential budget shortfall
in the 1996-97 year of about $3 million. How will it close the gap?
The City Council wisely has ruled out any tax increases. That narrows
the options to raising some users fees (probably not enough to balance
the budget) and reducing expenses. Although not a huge percentage of the
city's overall expenditures, the current budget request for LNX's 96-97
operating expenses is $132,500, up from the $84,000 it was allocated last
year.
Before approving the allocation, the City Council should carefully re-examine
what value taxpayers will be getting for their money and whether an alternative
- which may or may not offer the entire range of features LNX does - would
be preferable or, at least, acceptable.
The LNX is a custom-designed hybrid that incorporates features of both
a bulletin board and a World Wide Web page. For those in the slow lane
of the information superhighway, the Web is where all the hot action is
currently taking place and its growth is so manic no one can say with certainty
where it is going.
Perhaps the strongest argument made by LNX supporters in favor of their
approach is that it is free to the user (but not the taxpayer): to use
the Web, one needs access to the Internet and this costs money. To use
LNX, just step up to one of the kiosks in the city center.
Glendale resident Hal Weber, a LNX critic, has proposed to demonstrate
to the council how it could set up a low-cost web page to provide many
- although not all - of the services of the LNX. The council should listen
to Weber and any others who might have alternative concepts; they could
save the city money.
Defending her system in the News-Press last November, LNX Coordinator
Nancy Hunt-Coffey called it a “unique and priceless community service.”
It may very well still be, but with the city staring at a $3 million hole
in its budget, perhaps it’s time to admit we can get by with something
a little less unique and pricey.
|